That is the question Paul Jackson asks in his latest column entitled "Look to the right for a solution". Towards the end of his column, Jackson cuts to the chase and provides his diagnosis as to what ails the AAP:
The Alliance, as you may recall, pulled in 9% of the vote under founding leader Randy Thorsteinson in the 2004 provincial election, but except for Hinman's recent headline-hitting revelation about MLAs double-dipping, has basically been nowhere to be seen.
In "Alberta Alliance poised to strike," (Jan. 2), I recounted my chat with Hinman and how he was super-confident the Alliance was on the move.
Now it appears the headline was off-base.
Pondering this, I believe one of the reasons is Hinman himself isn't focused.
OK, he's a very nice fellow, intelligent and accomplished in several fields, but try to interview him and you come away exhausted.
Rather than stick with one issue, he goes off on a mishmash of tangents.
While each is fascinating and would make a column in itself, it frustrates any attempt to pull together a cohesive column on one particular issue.
Hinman and his advisers need to map out a straight-shooting strategy and stick with it.
To sum up, the Alberta Alliance suffers from weak leadership, and incoherent communications. If a political pro like Paul Jackson can't sit through an interview with Hinman without longing for its conclusion, how on earth do you Alberta Alliance members expect a typical voter to stay focused on his scattered message?
I must give credit to Paul Jackson for telling it like it is. I think he wrote this column with the best interests of the AAP in mind. I view it as an open letter to the membership.
Unfortunately for Jackson, the moribund Alberta Alliance membership will probably fail to comprehend the message in his column.
Source (click for screencap):
